Perley v. Inhabitants of Georgetown
This text of 73 Mass. 464 (Perley v. Inhabitants of Georgetown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A town cannot be made liable for the illegal acts of its officers or agents, unless those acts are done under its authority previously conferred, or are subsequently ratified by the town. In this case, the town did not authorize its treasurer and collector to commit the plaintiff to prison for not paying a tax that had been abated, nor did it ratify the act of imprisonment, by paying the collector’s fees for commitment, and the jailer’s charges. If these payments had been made by an individual, it could not be pretended that he thereby made himself liable tó the plaintiff in an action for false imprisonment. Noi can payment thereof by the town render the town so liable. The payments may have been made, and doubtless were made, for a very different purpose than that of ratifying or justifying the acts of their collector. Plaintiff nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Mass. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perley-v-inhabitants-of-georgetown-mass-1856.