Perley v. Forman

7 Nev. 309
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Whitman, J.:

To the complaint of respondent, the main allegations of which so far as the appellant is concerned are made upon “ information and belief,” a full and positive denial is made by answer; thereupon a motion to dissolve the injunction previously granted without notice. The evidence introduced upon the hearing of such motion entirely failed to sustain any of the material allegations, against appellant. The only testimony which in the remotest degree tended thereto, that of O’Connell, should have been excluded under the objection made. Still the motion was denied. Under what rule of procedure [312] or principle of equity, it is impossible to say. This action was too clearly erroneous to admit of discussion. The order appealed from is reversed, and the injunction granted against appellant is dissolved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perley v. Forman, 7 Nev. 309 (Neb. 1872).

7 Nev. 309 (Perley v. Forman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coronet Homes, Inc. v. Mylan
442 P.2d 901 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1968)