Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
This text of 214 N.W. 795 (Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari herein because not served upon the adverse party within 60 days as provided by G. S. 1923, §§ 9769 and 9770. The proceedings are under the compensation act, which does not specifically provide for service on the adverse party though it provides for service on the industrial commission. G. S. 1923, § 4320. Section 9770 is applicable. Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339, 208 N. W. 18. Such service may be made upon counsel who has appeared for the adverse party. G. S. 1923, § 9240.
The motion is granted and the writ is quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 N.W. 795, 171 Minn. 519, 1927 Minn. LEXIS 1642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkovich-v-oliver-iron-mining-co-minn-1927.