Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.

214 N.W. 795, 171 Minn. 519, 1927 Minn. LEXIS 1642
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 20, 1927·No. No. 26,186.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari herein because not served upon the adverse party within 60 days as provided by G. S. 1923, §§ 9769 and 9770. The proceedings are under the compensation act, which does not specifically provide for service on the adverse party though it provides for service on the industrial commission. G. S. 1923, § 4320. Section 9770 is applicable. Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339, 208 N. W. 18. Such service may be made upon counsel who has appeared for the adverse party. G. S. 1923, § 9240.

The motion is granted and the writ is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 214 N.W. 795, 171 Minn. 519, 1927 Minn. LEXIS 1642 (Mich. 1927).

214 N.W. 795 (Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Larson v. Le Mere
18 N.W.2d 696 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1945)
Haimila v. the Opsahl Co.
293 N.W. 599 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1940)