Perko v. State
This text of 574 So. 2d 157 (Perko v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant has appealed from the denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion for correction of sentence. We find merit in appellant’s contentions and thus remand this cause to the trial court for correction of appellant’s concurrent sentences so that all may reflect all time served and gain time acquired when appellant was. originally jailed and imprisoned for the grand theft offense, as well as any jail time served following appellant’s April 1, 1990, arrest. See Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986); State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
574 So. 2d 157, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8554, 1990 WL 175905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perko-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.