Perkinson v. State

339 S.W.2d 897, 170 Tex. Crim. 224, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2151
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 9, 1960
DocketNo. 32,309
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 339 S.W.2d 897 (Perkinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perkinson v. State, 339 S.W.2d 897, 170 Tex. Crim. 224, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2151 (Tex. 1960).

Opinion

BELCHER, Judge.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, five years.

While testifying, the state’s witness Brown identified the appellant as the woman who in company with a man, entered the drive-inn grocery where he was employed about midnight. After a brief time, the man approached Brown from behind and as Brown turned, the man prodded him in the stomach with a gun and said, “This is a hold-up. Just be careful and you won’t be hurt.” At this time the appellant was present with a pistol in her hand. Both the man and the appellant tried to open the cash register before it opened and they took, without Brown’s consent, more than $100 from it; and that their actions had put Brown in fear of his life. They cut the telephone wire and forced Brown into the rest room and closed the door. After getting out of the rest room, Brown saw the appellant and the man leaving in an automobile.

Appellant did not testify but called her daughter and her mother. Their testimony tends to show that the man who was with appellant at the time of the robbery was her husband and because of duress by him she participated in the commission of the offense.

The evidence is sufficient to support the conviction.

[225]*225There are no formal bills of exception.

A requested defensive charge that she acted under duress was refused. If the evidence raised the defense of duress, the refusal of the requested charge was not error as no exception to its refusal was reserved. Smith v. State, 166 Tex. Cr. Rep. 294, 313 SW 2d 291.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Medlock v. State
356 S.W.2d 312 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Mosley v. State
352 S.W.2d 847 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
339 S.W.2d 897, 170 Tex. Crim. 224, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkinson-v-state-texcrimapp-1960.