Perkins v. The New York Times Company

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 10, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-05202·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MEGAN PERKINS, on behalf of herself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-05202 (PKC) )

v. ) CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER )

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, )

d/b/a THE NEW YORK TIMES, ) ) Defendant. )

This case is before this Court for entry of a protective order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Case Management Order. The parties anticipate that the discovery in this case may include production and disclosures by the parties and by third parties of information that may be confidential or proprietary, including, without limitation, financial information, personally identifiable information, and/or commercially sensitive confidential business information. Accordingly, entry of this Consent Protective Order is in the interest of all parties and in the interest of the fair and efficient administration of justice. Therefore, until further order of this Court, it hereby is ordered that the parties shall follow the procedures set forth below with respect to information, documents, testimony, or tangible things produced or otherwise disclosed in this litigation: 1. “CONFIDENTIAL Information” shall mean any information, documents, testimony, or tangible things (“Information”) furnished in the course of this litigation regarded by a party or non-party as confidential and/or private information, including proprietary data, trade secrets, other valuable or commercially sensitive information, confidential or private information concerning parties, witnesses, and persons not party to this action, and/or commercially sensitive or otherwise confidential information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” pursuant to the procedures set forth below. The term “documents” shall be broadly construed to include information that is recorded in any form, including but not limited to hard copy, electronically stored information, and audio and video recordings.

2. All Information that is designated CONFIDENTIAL under this Protective Order shall be kept confidential and shall not be given, shown, made available, discussed, or otherwise communicated in any manner (“disclosed”), either directly or indirectly, to any person not authorized to receive the Information under the terms of this Protective Order. CONFIDENTIAL Information received by any authorized person shall be used only for purposes of this litigation and for no other purpose. 3. If any Information designated CONFIDENTIAL is disclosed to any person other than in the manner authorized by this Order, the person responsible for the disclosure must immediately bring all pertinent facts relating to such disclosure to the attention of counsel for the

designating party and, without prejudice to any other rights and remedies of the parties, make every effort to prevent further disclosure by it or by the person who was the recipient of such Information. 4. Information shall be designated CONFIDENTIAL within the meaning of this Protective Order in the following ways: (a) In the case of documents or tangible things, including the information contained therein, that are produced by any party, designation shall be made by placing on each page of the document or each tangible thing the legend or stamp CONFIDENTIAL. (b) In the case of electronic records (i.e., native electronic files such as, but not limited to, excel documents) where the files themselves are not stamped, designation shall be made in the discovery response by assigning those records a Bates number or numbers, followed by the appropriate designation for those records. The Bates number and confidentiality designation shall be affixed to a placeholder slipsheet that shall be produced contemporaneously with the

corresponding native file. A confidentiality designation and/or Bates number may also be included in the title of a native file so long as the original title of the native document is also maintained (unless or as otherwise discussed in a separate discovery protocol). (c) In the case of responses to interrogatories and requests for admission, including the information contained therein, designation shall be made by placing on the pages containing the CONFIDENTIAL Information the legend CONFIDENTIAL. (d) With regard to subparts (a)-(c) above, in the event of an inadvertent or unintentional production without prior designation as CONFIDENTIAL has occurred, the party desiring to so mark such documents, records, or discovery responses as CONFIDENTIAL may do

so by providing notice to the other party of such inadvertent or unintentional production, and marking such material as CONFIDENTIAL, within five business days of such discovery (e) In the case of deposition testimony, counsel may designate, on the record, those portions of a deposition that counsel believes contain CONFIDENTIAL Information. If designation of CONFIDENTIAL Information is made, those portions of said depositions involving such CONFIDENTIAL Information will be taken with no one present except those persons who are authorized to have access to such CONFIDENTIAL Information in accordance with this Protective Order. A witness, whose deposition is being taken, may see any document identified as CONFIDENTIAL if the witness is within the category of persons entitled to see this type of information, pursuant to the provisions described below in section 6. Any party shall have thirty days after the receipt of the deposition transcript to inform the other parties to the action of the portions of the transcript (by specific page and line reference) to be designated as CONFIDENTIAL. Unless otherwise agreed by counsel, the right to make such designation shall be waived unless made within the thirty-day period. Prior to such designation or the expiration of

the thirty-day period, the entire deposition transcript shall be deemed CONFIDENTIAL Information. 5. The parties agree to designate Information as CONFIDENTIAL on a good-faith basis and not for purposes of harassing the other parties or for purposes of unnecessarily restricting the other parties’ access to information concerning the lawsuit. 6. Discovery material designated “CONFIDENTIAL” may be inspected and disclosed only to the following persons: (a) attorneys of record for the parties in this action and the staff of their respective law firms (including associates, legal assistants and paralegals) working on this action;

(b) the parties, including the directors, officers, managers, and employees of the parties to this action and their affiliates, including inside counsel of any party; (c) court officials involved in this action, including court reporters, stenographers, and persons operating video recording equipment at depositions; (d) witnesses, provided that (i) discovery material is used in connection with the examination of the witness; (ii) counsel using such documents or information believes in good faith that such use is necessary or appropriate; and (iii) the witness is first provided with a copy of this Order and executes Exhibit A, or is the author, recipient, or a copy of such discovery material; (e) independent contractors, outside consultants and experts and their staff consulted or retained by a party for the purpose of assisting in the prosecution or defense of this action, provided the material is used only to the extent needed to perform their duties, that such persons shall be given a copy of this Order, advised that they are bound by it, and sign Exhibit A; and

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perkins v. The New York Times Company, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Perkins v. The New York Times Company (Perkins v. The New York Times Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)