Perkins v. Stickney

132 Mass. 217, 1882 Mass. LEXIS 52
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by39 cases

This text of 132 Mass. 217 (Perkins v. Stickney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perkins v. Stickney, 132 Mass. 217, 1882 Mass. LEXIS 52 (Mass. 1882).

Opinion

Endicott, J.

Whether a witness who is called as an expert has the requisite qualifications and knowledge to enable him to testify, is a preliminary question for the court. The decision of this question is conclusive, unless it appears upon the evidence to have been erroneous, or to have been founded upon some error in law. Nunes v. Perry, 113 Mass. 274, 276. Commonwealth v. Sturtivant, 117 Mass. 122. In the case at bar, no such error is shown; on the contrary, it appears that the witness had no knowledge of the quality of the coal in question, except through the reports of his engineer. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finberg Manufacturing Co. v. Carter
455 N.E.2d 451 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1983)
Commonwealth v. Grammo
395 N.E.2d 476 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1979)
Venini v. Dias
369 N.E.2d 1026 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1977)
Louise Caroline Nursing Home, Inc. v. Dix Construction Corp.
285 N.E.2d 904 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1972)
Bearse v. Barron
39 Mass. App. Dec. 219 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1968)
Commonwealth v. Stirling
218 N.E.2d 81 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1966)
Winthrop Products Corp. v. Elroth Co.
117 N.E.2d 157 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1954)
Rubin v. Town of Arlington
99 N.E.2d 30 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1951)
State v. Harkins
281 P. 551 (Montana Supreme Court, 1929)
Guinan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
167 N.E. 247 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Old Silver Beach Corp. v. Inhabitants of Falmouth
266 Mass. 224 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Pridgen v. . Gibson
139 S.E. 443 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
United States v. Golden
1 F.2d 543 (D. Minnesota, 1923)
United States v. Percansky
298 F. 991 (D. Minnesota, 1923)
Commonwealth v. Spencer
99 N.E. 266 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
Fourth National Bank v. Commonwealth
98 N.E. 686 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
Rogers v. Clark Iron Co.
116 N.W. 739 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
Muskeget Island Club v. Inhabitants of Nantucket
70 N.E. 61 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)
White v. McPherson
67 N.E. 643 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Bradford Glycerine Co. v. Kizer
113 F. 894 (Sixth Circuit, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 Mass. 217, 1882 Mass. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-stickney-mass-1882.