Perkins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Perkins v. State

1912 OK CR 44, 119 P. 1132, 6 Okla. Crim. 709, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 293

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 11, 1912

DocketNo. A-1495.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 44 (Perkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perkins v. State, 1912 OK CR 44, 119 P. 1132, 6 Okla. Crim. 709, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 293 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

H. M. Perkins, plaintiff in error, was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law and September 27, 1911, was sentenced to serve a term of ninety days in the county jail and to pay a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars. An appeal was properly perfected. January 9, 1912, his counsel of record filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained and the cause remanded to the county court of Oklahoma county with direction to enforce the judgment therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

H. M. Perkins, plaintiff in error, was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law and September 27, 1911, was sentenced to serve a term of ninety days in the county jail and to pay a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars. An appeal was properly perfected. January 9, 1912, his counsel of record filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained and the cause remanded to the county court of Oklahoma county with direction to enforce the judgment therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 44, 119 P. 1132, 6 Okla. Crim. 709, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.