Perkins v. State
This text of 505 S.W.3d 344 (Perkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Reginald Perkins appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motions to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rules 24.0351 and 29.15.2 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rules 24.035(k) and 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
505 S.W.3d 344, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1098, 2016 WL 6440404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-state-moctapp-2016.