Perkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Perkins v. State

505 S.W.3d 344, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1098, 2016 WL 6440404

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 2016·No. No. ED 103602·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Perkins appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motions to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rules 24.035¹ and 29.15.² We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rules 24.035(k) and 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Perkins appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motions to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rules 24.035¹ and 29.15.² We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rules 24.035(k) and 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Perkins v. State, 505 S.W.3d 344, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1098, 2016 WL 6440404 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

505 S.W.3d 344 (Perkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.