Perkins v. State

348 S.W.3d 181, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2011 WL 4369203
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 20, 2011
DocketED 95096
StatusPublished

This text of 348 S.W.3d 181 (Perkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perkins v. State, 348 S.W.3d 181, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2011 WL 4369203 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cedric Perkins (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment, after an eviden-tiary hearing, denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. *182 However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 S.W.3d 181, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2011 WL 4369203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-state-moctapp-2011.