Perkins v. State
This text of 2016 Ark. App. 252 (Perkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 252
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CR-15-762
Opinion Delivered May 4, 2016
ANDREW TYLER PERKINS APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. CR-14-26]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE JERRY RYAN, JUDGE APPELLEE
AFFIRMED
WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge
Appellant Andrew Perkins was found guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia
(methamphetamines) and misdemeanor public intoxication by a Montgomery County jury.
He was sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment on the possession charge and was fined $100
for public intoxication.
Perkins argues on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion by not granting him
a continuance after voir dire. When the only issue is whether the trial court abused its
discretion, we may affirm by memorandum opinion.1 We have examined the parties’ briefs
and the applicable law, and we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in denying the
continuance. We therefore affirm by memorandum opinion.
1 In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985) (per curiam). Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 252
Affirmed.
GRUBER and GLOVER, JJ., agree.
Justin B. Hurst, for appellant.
Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Jake H. Jones, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 Ark. App. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-state-arkctapp-2016.