Perkins v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Perkins v. State

110 So. 475, 215 Ala. 299, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 442

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 26, 1926·No. 6 Div. 843.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court of Appeals correctly ruled that the trial court committed error in sustaining the demurrers to defendant’s pleas of former acquittal numbered 1 and 2; this for reasons that are well stated *300 in Savage v. State, 18 Ala. App. 299, 92 So. 19. In so far as the question of error without injury is concerned, that involved an inquiry of fact which this court will not indulge on applications to review the Court of Appeals by certiorari.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MIDLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Court of Appeals correctly ruled that the trial court committed error in sustaining the demurrers to defendant’s pleas of former acquittal numbered 1 and 2; this for reasons that are well stated *300 in Savage v. State, 18 Ala. App. 299, 92 So. 19. In so far as the question of error without injury is concerned, that involved an inquiry of fact which this court will not indulge on applications to review the Court of Appeals by certiorari.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MIDLER, JJ., concur.

Perkins v. State, 110 So. 475, 215 Ala. 299, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 442 (Ala. 1926).

Pincite

110 So. 475 (Perkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related