Perkins v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Perkins v. State

110 So. 475, 215 Ala. 299, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 442

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 26, 1926

Docket6 Div. 843.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 So. 475 (Perkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perkins v. State, 110 So. 475, 215 Ala. 299, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 442 (Ala. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court of Appeals correctly ruled that the trial court committed error in sustaining the demurrers to defendant’s pleas of former acquittal numbered 1 and 2; this for reasons that are well stated *300 in Savage v. State, 18 Ala. App. 299, 92 So. 19. In so far as the question of error without injury is concerned, that involved an inquiry of fact which this court will not indulge on applications to review the Court of Appeals by certiorari.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MIDLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Court of Appeals correctly ruled that the trial court committed error in sustaining the demurrers to defendant’s pleas of former acquittal numbered 1 and 2; this for reasons that are well stated *300 in Savage v. State, 18 Ala. App. 299, 92 So. 19. In so far as the question of error without injury is concerned, that involved an inquiry of fact which this court will not indulge on applications to review the Court of Appeals by certiorari.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MIDLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 So. 475, 215 Ala. 299, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-state-ala-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack