Perkins v. Sheriff, Clark County
This text of 547 P.2d 312 (Perkins v. Sheriff, Clark County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Robert Perkins was charged with, and ordered to stand trial for, attempted murder. Thereafter he filed a petition for habeas *181 corpus contending the evidence adduced at the preliminary examination was insufficient to meet the probable cause requirement delineated in NRS 171.206. The district court denied habeas and the same contention has been brought forward by appeal.
This record establishes, inter alia, that during an altercation over a parking space John Shields wrested a knife from Perkins’ hand and discarded it; Perkins then ran into his lodging and returned with a revolver; the parties again struggled; the gun discharged; and, Shields was wounded.
We believe such evidence, while marginal, justified the magistrate’s determination that there was probable cause to hold Perkins for trial. See State v. Havas, 91 Nev. 611, 540 P.2d 1060 (1975). Cf. Maupin v. Sheriff, 90 Nev. 99, 520 P.2d 237 (1974); Mathis v. State, 82 Nev. 402, 419 P.2d 775 (1966). We are not now concerned that such evidence may, by itself, be insufficient to convict Perkins of the charged offense. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
547 P.2d 312, 92 Nev. 180, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-sheriff-clark-county-nev-1976.