Perkins v. Rich

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Perkins v. Rich

385 Mass. 1001

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJanuary 7, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 385 Mass. 1001 (Perkins v. Rich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perkins v. Rich, 385 Mass. 1001 (Mass. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

This case is before us on further appellate review following an opinion of the Appeals Court affirming judgments of the Superior Court. Perkins v. Rich, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 317, 324 (1981). At issue is the validity of certain mortgages given to two banks by instruments executed by the defendant Rich, purportedly on behalf of the First Parish Unitarian Church of East Bridgewater (Church).

We need not repeat the facts recited in the opinion of the Appeals Court. We agree with the Appeals Court that the subsidiary facts found by the master show that the Church’s parish committee in effect ratified the mortgage transactions. The parish committee should have conducted an investigation, and, if it had done so, it would have discovered the mortgages. The failure of the parish committee to act to disavow the mortgages, of whose existence the committee should have known, constituted a ratification of them.

Judgments of the Superior Court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case is before us on further appellate review following an opinion of the Appeals Court affirming judgments of the Superior Court. Perkins v. Rich, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 317, 324 (1981). At issue is the validity of certain mortgages given to two banks by instruments executed by the defendant Rich, purportedly on behalf of the First Parish Unitarian Church of East Bridgewater (Church).

We need not repeat the facts recited in the opinion of the Appeals Court. We agree with the Appeals Court that the subsidiary facts found by the master show that the Church’s parish committee in effect ratified the mortgage transactions. The parish committee should have conducted an investigation, and, if it had done so, it would have discovered the mortgages. The failure of the parish committee to act to disavow the mortgages, of whose existence the committee should have known, constituted a ratification of them.

Judgments of the Superior Court affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

385 Mass. 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-rich-mass-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack