Perkins v. Quint

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Perkins v. Quint

45 A. 143, 69 N.H. 428

DecidedDecember 5, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A. 143 (Perkins v. Quint) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perkins v. Quint, 45 A. 143, 69 N.H. 428 (N.H. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Peaslee, J.

When the insolvency proceedings were instituted and Hobson was notified thereof, the probate court acquired jurisdiction of his claims against the defendant. Jurisdiction that has once attached is not defeated by subsequent events. Clarke v. Mathewson, 12 Pet. 164, 171; Tapley v. Martin, 116 Mass. 275.

The discharge applied to all claims of which the court had jurisdiction, and the actions cannot be maintained.

Judgments for the defendant.

Blodgett, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peaslee, J.

When the insolvency proceedings were instituted and Hobson was notified thereof, the probate court acquired jurisdiction of his claims against the defendant. Jurisdiction that has once attached is not defeated by subsequent events. Clarke v. Mathewson, 12 Pet. 164, 171; Tapley v. Martin, 116 Mass. 275.

The discharge applied to all claims of which the court had jurisdiction, and the actions cannot be maintained.

Judgments for the defendant.

Blodgett, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A. 143, 69 N.H. 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-quint-nh-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack