Perkins v. Perkins

589 S.W.2d 29, 267 Ark. 112, 1979 Ark. LEXIS 1581
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 13, 1979
Docket79-304
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 589 S.W.2d 29 (Perkins v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perkins v. Perkins, 589 S.W.2d 29, 267 Ark. 112, 1979 Ark. LEXIS 1581 (Ark. 1979).

Opinion

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The petitioners seek review of a Court of Appeals decision in a child custody case citing three reasons: a tie-vote of the Court of Appeals, a significant legal issue and an erroneous application of the standard of review for such a case.

After carefully reviewing the petition, the response and the opinion of the Court of Appeals judges, we find that essentially there is simply a question of fact involved and that is, which party should have custody of the child in question. We find nothing else that would warrant granting the review and, consequently, we deny the petition.

Rule 29.6 of the Supreme Court Rules specifically states that no appeal, as a matter of right, lies from the Court of Appeals to this court. While a tie-vote may be reason for us to review a decision of the Court of Appeals, we do not automatically grant such a review. This is one of those cases that we find does not merit review.

Harris, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standridge v. State
837 S.W.2d 447 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
589 S.W.2d 29, 267 Ark. 112, 1979 Ark. LEXIS 1581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-perkins-ark-1979.