Perkins v. Pennsylvania

314 U.S. 586, 62 S. Ct. 484
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 5, 1942·No. No. 794·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. § 1606 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code as amended, 53 Stat. 1391; Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 299 U. S. 334.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perkins v. Pennsylvania, 314 U.S. 586, 62 S. Ct. 484 (1942).

314 U.S. 586 (Perkins v. Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Black Construction Corp. v. Agsalud
639 P.2d 1088 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1982)
Buxton v. Midwestern Ins. Co.
102 F. Supp. 500 (W.D. Louisiana, 1952)
Prudential Insurance v. Benjamin
328 U.S. 408 (Supreme Court, 1946)
State v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
64 N.E.2d 150 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1945)
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
326 U.S. 310 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Standard Dredging Corp. v. Murphy
319 U.S. 306 (Supreme Court, 1943)
In Re the Claim of Cassaretakis
44 N.E.2d 391 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)