Perkins v. Orr
This text of Perkins v. Orr (Perkins v. Orr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1981
JAMES CHESTER PERKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOUGLAS ORR, III; UNKNOWN DEPUTY 1; UNKNOWN DEPUTY 2; UNKNOWN DEPUTY 3; HORRY’S WRECKER SERVICE; TOW TRUCK DRIVER; DIRECTOR OF DETENTION FACILITY; JAILER; JASPER COUNTY SHERIFF; JOHN DOE 1-20,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-04-835-9-8)
Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: January 13, 2005
Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Chester Perkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
James Chester Perkins appeals the district court’s order
substantially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Perkins v. Orr, No. CA-04-835-9-8 (D.S.C. July 1, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Perkins v. Orr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-orr-ca4-2005.