Perkins v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Perkins v. New York State Division of Parole

80 A.D.3d 1045, 914 N.Y.S.2d 693

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 80 A.D.3d 1045 (Perkins v. New York State Division of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perkins v. New York State Division of Parole, 80 A.D.3d 1045, 914 N.Y.S.2d 693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), entered June 16, 2010 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an October 2008 decision of the Board of Parole denying [1046]*1046his request for parole release. The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in October 2010 at which time his request for parole release was again denied. In view of this, the appeal is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Borcsok v New York State Bd. of Parole, 76 AD3d 1167 [2010]; Matter of Perez v Alexander, 69 AD3d 1195, 1196 [2010]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), entered June 16, 2010 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an October 2008 decision of the Board of Parole denying [1046]*1046his request for parole release. The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in October 2010 at which time his request for parole release was again denied. In view of this, the appeal is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Borcsok v New York State Bd. of Parole, 76 AD3d 1167 [2010]; Matter of Perez v Alexander, 69 AD3d 1195, 1196 [2010]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.3d 1045, 914 N.Y.S.2d 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-new-york-state-division-of-parole-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack