Perkins v. Murphy
This text of 11 A.D.2d 783 (Perkins v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 22, 1959, denying his application for a preference under rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, with leave to renew on consent to an examination of plaintiff by an independent physician selected by the court. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 A.D.2d 783, 205 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-murphy-nyappdiv-1960.