Perkins v. Mossman
44 N.J.L. 579
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
By the judgment of the court below, Annie Mossman recovered damages for the injury received by being bitten by a dog belonging to Perkins.
It is well settled that the owner of a dog is liable for an injury committed by the dog, if he had notice of his mischievous propensities. In this case, there is evidence to show that the owner had notice that, on two prior occasions, the dog had shown a vicious disposition, and he kept him, therefore, at his peril.
The judgment below should be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perkins v. Mossman, 44 N.J.L. 579 (N.J. 1882).
44 N.J.L. 579 (Perkins v. Mossman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DeRobertis v. Randazzo
462 A.2d 1260 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Jannuzzelli v. Wilkens
385 A.2d 322 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Tanga v. Tanga
226 A.2d 723 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)