Perkins v. Mossman

44 N.J.L. 579
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 44 N.J.L. 579 (Perkins v. Mossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perkins v. Mossman, 44 N.J.L. 579 (N.J. 1882).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

"Van Syckel, J.

By the judgment of the court below, Annie Mossman recovered damages for the injury received by being bitten by a dog belonging to Perkins.

It is well settled that the owner of a dog is liable for an injury committed by the dog, if he had notice of his mischievous propensities. In this case, there is evidence to show that the owner had notice that, on two prior occasions, the dog had shown a vicious disposition, and he kept him, therefore, at his peril.

The judgment below should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeRobertis v. Randazzo
462 A.2d 1260 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Jannuzzelli v. Wilkens
385 A.2d 322 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Tanga v. Tanga
226 A.2d 723 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 N.J.L. 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-mossman-nj-1882.