Perkins v. James W. Tabor Sons

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Perkins v. James W. Tabor Sons

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided January 23, 1995·No. I.C. No. 248617·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff moves the Industrial Commission for a continuance in this matter due to the reason that the plaintiff is not represented and would like a continuance in order to retain counsel.

Upon plaintiff's motion and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a CONTINUANCE is hereby GRANTED.

FOR THE FULL COMMISSION

S/ __________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff moves the Industrial Commission for a continuance in this matter due to the reason that the plaintiff is not represented and would like a continuance in order to retain counsel.

Upon plaintiff's motion and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a CONTINUANCE is hereby GRANTED.

FOR THE FULL COMMISSION

S/ __________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Perkins v. James W. Tabor Sons, (N.C. Super. Ct. 1995).

Pincite

Perkins v. James W. Tabor Sons (Perkins v. James W. Tabor Sons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.