Perkins v. Davis
This text of 16 Wis. 470 (Perkins v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
Cord vs. Southwell, 15 Wis., 211 and Hitchcock vs. Merrick, 15 Wis., 522, are decisive of these appeals. They are from final judgments, and the only question is upon the taxation of the clerk’s costs. The costs exceed the limit fixed by statute, and the taxation is said to have been without notice. It was irregular in both respects; but as the defendant did not move in the court below to set asided the taxation and bring the cases here upon proper exceptions, the judgments must be affirmed.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Wis. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-davis-wis-1863.