Perkins v. Davis
16 Wis. 470
Opinion
By the Court,
Cord vs. Southwell, 15 Wis., 211 and Hitchcock vs. Merrick, 15 Wis., 522, are decisive of these appeals. They are from final judgments, and the only question is upon the taxation of the clerk’s costs. The costs exceed the limit fixed by statute, and the taxation is said to have been without notice. It was irregular in both respects; but as the defendant did not move in the court below to set asided the taxation and bring the cases here upon proper exceptions, the judgments must be affirmed.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perkins v. Davis, 16 Wis. 470 (Wis. 1863).
16 Wis. 470 (Perkins v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Broadway Roller Rink Co.
118 N.W. 170 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)
Feske v. Adam
112 N.W. 456 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)
Fowler v. Metzger Seed & Oil Co.
111 N.W. 677 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)
Lauterbach v. Netzo
87 N.W. 230 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)