Perkins v. Coray
This text of 46 A. 1103 (Perkins v. Coray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
While there are some facts in the case No. 245, January term, 1899, now pending in this court, in which an opinion has just been filed, which are not in the present case, the substance of the contention raised upon the affidavits of defense in the two cases, is practically the same. In the opinion just filed we have indicated at some length the reason why we think the affidavits in that case were sufficient to take it to the jury, and the same reasons in substance are applicable to the present controversy. We sustain the assignments of error and reverse the order to make absolute the rule for judgment.
Judgment reversed and procedendo awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 A. 1103, 196 Pa. 608, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-coray-pa-1900.