Perkins v. Conradi
959 P.2d 1013, 154 Or. App. 439, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 910
Opinion
Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of our opinion on reconsideration, 153 Or App 273, 956 P2d 1022 (1998). We allow the petition to reconsider. Footnote one is deleted from our previous opinion because it contains an erroneous statement of fact. The statement of fact was unrelated to our analysis. We adhere to our opinion as modified.
Petition for reconsideration allowed. Opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perkins v. Conradi, 959 P.2d 1013, 154 Or. App. 439, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 910 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).
959 P.2d 1013 (Perkins v. Conradi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duckworth v. Duckworth
Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2023
Ross Dress for Less, Inc. v. Makarios-Oregon, LLC
180 F. Supp. 3d 745 (D. Oregon, 2016)
G. B. v. Morey
215 P.3d 879 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)