Perkins v. Commercial Advertiser Ass'n

New York Supreme Court

Perkins v. Commercial Advertiser Ass'n

34 N.Y.S. 1064, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 24, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 7, 89 Hun 24

DecidedJuly 26, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.Y.S. 1064 (Perkins v. Commercial Advertiser Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perkins v. Commercial Advertiser Ass'n, 34 N.Y.S. 1064, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 24, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 7, 89 Hun 24 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order changing the place of trial from the county of Queens to the city and county of New York. It is conceded that both the parties reside in the county of New York, that the plaintiff gave the defendant 20 days’ further time to plead, on condition that issue should remain of the original date of February 8th; and it is claimed that that extension was a consent to the trial of the action in the county named in the summons and complaint. The position of the appellant is untenable. Under the stipulation, the date of the issue when it was formed was to be the 8th day of February, but the time of joining issue was when the answer was served. As the motion was made before that time, it was regular and within the statute. The order should be affirmed, with $10. costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order changing the place of trial from the county of Queens to the city and county of New York. It is conceded that both the parties reside in the county of New York, that the plaintiff gave the defendant 20 days’ further time to plead, on condition that issue should remain of the original date of February 8th; and it is claimed that that extension was a consent to the trial of the action in the county named in the summons and complaint. The position of the appellant is untenable. Under the stipulation, the date of the issue when it was formed was to be the 8th day of February, but the time of joining issue was when the answer was served. As the motion was made before that time, it was regular and within the statute. The order should be affirmed, with $10. costs and disbursements. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.Y.S. 1064, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 24, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 7, 89 Hun 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-commercial-advertiser-assn-nysupct-1895.