Perkins v. City of Lawrence

136 Mass. 305, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 91
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 29, 1884·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

C. Allen, J.

The plaintiff in his opening, as well as in his declaration, stated that the injury of which he complains was caused by the negligence of the defendant’s servants, and so brought his case directly within the authority of Hand v. Brookline, 126 Mass. 324, where the town was held liable for an injury to the plaintiff’s property, through neglect in the construction of water-works which the town had been authorized by [307] a special statute, voluntarily accepted, to construct and to receive profits from; and the case is distinguishable from one where the work was executed in a reasonably proper and skilful manner, as in Hull v. Westfield, 133 Mass. 433, in which case the damage can be recovered only in the manner pointed out by the statute. The St. of 1872, c. 79, under which the defendant acted, resembled that involved in Hand v. Brookline in all the particulars mentioned or material to be considered.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perkins v. City of Lawrence, 136 Mass. 305, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 91 (Mass. 1884).

136 Mass. 305 (Perkins v. City of Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucas v. City of Boston
48 N.E.2d 6 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
Pearl v. Inhabitants of Revere
107 N.E. 417 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Haley v. City of Boston
77 N.E. 888 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of Portland
43 L.R.A. 435 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1899)