Perkins v. Bunn

56 Kan. 271
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1896
DocketNo. 7918
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 Kan. 271 (Perkins v. Bunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perkins v. Bunn, 56 Kan. 271 (kan 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

At April term, 1891, the plaintiffs recovered judgment against Elizabeth Bunn and D. M. Bunn for $13,112.40, on a promissory note and six coupons, but the court refused to render judgment on three other coupons of $700 each, on the ground that the right of action thereon was barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiffs excepted to this refusal of judgment on the three coupons, and on October 31, 1891, they instituted this proceeding in error. Before doing so, however, the defendants had paid and the plaintiffs received the full amount of the judgment rendered, together with interest and costs, and for [272]*272this reason the defendants in error move to dismiss this proceeding; and the motion must be sustained, on the authority of Savings Bank v. Butler (just decided) and the cases therein cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seaverns v. State
93 P. 163 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 Kan. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perkins-v-bunn-kan-1896.