Perkins v. B & W Contractors, Inc.

439 So. 2d 656, 1983 La. App. LEXIS 9386
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perkins v. B & W Contractors, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1983 La. App. LEXIS 9385
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 11, 1983·No. No. 82 CA 0649·Published

Opinion

LOTTINGER, Judge.

This appeal was consolidated with No. 83 CA 0386, 439 So.2d 652 (La.App.1983). In this proceeding the trial court found that restrictions to Meadowood Hills Subdivision were valid, had not been abandoned because of violations, had not been amended, but had been and were being violated by the defendant-appellant herein, B & W Contractors, Inc., and enjoined further violation and ordered the removal of any violations that had thus far been constructed. How[657]*657ever, because of our decision in 83 CA 0386, 439 So.2d 652, this day rendered, we dismiss this appeal as moot at appellant’s costs.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perkins v. B & W Contractors, Inc., 439 So. 2d 656, 1983 La. App. LEXIS 9386 (La. Ct. App. 1983).

439 So. 2d 656 (Perkins v. B & W Contractors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perkins v. B & W CONTRACTORS, INC.
439 So. 2d 652 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)