Perius v. Nodak Mutual Ins. Co.
This text of 2012 ND 54 (Perius v. Nodak Mutual Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 3/15/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2012 ND 49
In the Interest of I.D., a child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
I.D., C.L., and M.D., Respondents
--------------
M.D. and I.D., Appellants
No. 20110275
Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Bradley A. Cruff (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 230 4th Street NW, Room 301, Valley City, ND 58072, for petitioner and appellee.
M.D. (argued), self-represented, and I.D. (appeared), 9877 County Road 28, Wimbledon, ND 58492, appellants.
Interest of I.D.
[¶1] M.D. appeals from a juvenile court order adjudicating his child, I.D., a delinquent child. On appeal, M.D. argues the juvenile court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence because I.D. was in custody during police questioning, I.D. was not advised of his rights, and M.D. was not notified of the questioning.
[¶2] “If an appeal is taken in a case in which an evidentiary hearing was held, the appellant must order a transcript of the proceedings . . . .” N.D.R.App.P. 10(b)(1). M.D. failed to order transcripts, without which we cannot review the evidence before the juvenile court. “We have warned that an appellant ‘assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript.’” In re A.R. , 2000 ND 130, ¶ 5, 612 N.W.2d 569 (quoting City of Fargo v. Erickson , 1999 ND 145, ¶ 16, 598 N.W.2d 787 (citation omitted)). In the absence of a transcript, we find nothing in the record to contradict the juvenile court’s findings, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 ND 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perius-v-nodak-mutual-ins-co-nd-2012.