Perito v. Perito

135 A.D.2d 623, 522 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52558
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced in August 1980, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), dated June 30, 1986, which denied his motion to, inter alia, vacate a stipulation entered into by the parties.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The parties entered into a stipulation in open court pursuant to which they agreed to have the value of the marital residence fixed by a court-appointed appraiser. Absent a showing that the stipulation was the product of overreaching, fraud or duress, there was no basis for setting aside the stipulation, and the parties are bound by the appraiser’s evaluation of the property (see, Harrington v Harrington, 103 AD2d 356). Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perito v. Perito, 135 A.D.2d 623, 522 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

135 A.D.2d 623 (Perito v. Perito) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nathel v. Nathel
55 A.D.3d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)