Perini v. Schmyg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Perini v. Schmyg

24 Misc. 761, 53 N.Y.S. 946

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 24 Misc. 761 (Perini v. Schmyg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perini v. Schmyg, 24 Misc. 761, 53 N.Y.S. 946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The owner having discharged the lien by deposit with the county clerk, no order for its continuance Was necessary in order to support a foreclosure action instituted after the [762]*762expiration of a year from the date of filing the lien. Hafker v. Henry, 5 App. Div. 258. The judgment also was not so erroneous in form as to call for a reversal. Egan v. Laemmle, 5 Misc. Rep. 244. .

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The owner having discharged the lien by deposit with the county clerk, no order for its continuance Was necessary in order to support a foreclosure action instituted after the [762]*762expiration of a year from the date of filing the lien. Hafker v. Henry, 5 App. Div. 258. The judgment also was not so erroneous in form as to call for a reversal. Egan v. Laemmle, 5 Misc. Rep. 244. .

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Misc. 761, 53 N.Y.S. 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perini-v-schmyg-nyappterm-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack