Perini v. Schmyg
24 Misc. 761, 53 N.Y.S. 946
Opinion
The owner having discharged the lien by deposit with the county clerk, no order for its continuance Was necessary in order to support a foreclosure action instituted after the [762] expiration of a year from the date of filing the lien. Hafker v. Henry, 5 App. Div. 258. The judgment also was not so erroneous in form as to call for a reversal. Egan v. Laemmle, 5 Misc. Rep. 244. .
Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perini v. Schmyg, 24 Misc. 761, 53 N.Y.S. 946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).
24 Misc. 761 (Perini v. Schmyg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hafker v. Henry
5 A.D. 258 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)