Perini v. Colosimo

Supreme Court

Perini v. Colosimo

399 U.S. 519, 90 S. Ct. 2233, 26 L. Ed. 2d 777, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 1263

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 29, 1970·No. 801·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dispense with printing the petition and the motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Chambers v. Maroney, ante, p. 42.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, he would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chambers v. Maroney, ante, p. 55.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion to dispense with printing the petition and the motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Chambers v. Maroney, ante, p. 42.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, he would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chambers v. Maroney, ante, p. 55.

Perini v. Colosimo, 399 U.S. 519, 90 S. Ct. 2233, 26 L. Ed. 2d 777, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 1263 (1970).

Pincite

399 U.S. 519 (Perini v. Colosimo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related