Perigo v. Wiseman

2000 OK 67, 11 P.3d 217, 2000 Okla. LEXIS 65, 2000 WL 1371520
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 19, 2000
Docket95,064
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 2000 OK 67 (Perigo v. Wiseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perigo v. Wiseman, 2000 OK 67, 11 P.3d 217, 2000 Okla. LEXIS 65, 2000 WL 1371520 (Okla. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

T 0 Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let a writ issue prohibiting the respondent Judge Jane Wiseman, or any other judge from proceeding further with that cause now pending before the District Court in Tulsa County in which the real party in interest Catia Marie Dorwart, a minor by and through Erica Anne Dorwart her mother and custodial parent are the plaintiffs, and petitioner Jerry L. Perigo is the defendant, Cause No. CJ-00-2070. A court-appointed guardian ad litem in a custody matter is immune from suit by the ward or any other party, for all acts arising out of or relating to the discharge of his duties as *218 guardian ad litem. Kahre v. Kahre, 1995 OK 133, 916 P.2d 1355; Kirschstein v. Haynes, 1990 OK 8, 788 P.2d 941.

{1 DONE BY THE ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 18 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2000.

12 SUMMERS, C.J., HARGRAVE, V.C.J., HODGES, LAVENDER, KAUGER, WATT, BOUDREAU, and WINCHESTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deutsche Bank v. Lucero
New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2018
Bradt v. White
190 Misc. 2d 526 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Bluntt v. O'Connor
291 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2000 OK 67, 11 P.3d 217, 2000 Okla. LEXIS 65, 2000 WL 1371520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perigo-v-wiseman-okla-2000.