Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of Sacramento

E.D. California

Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of Sacramento

DecidedMay 17, 2022

Docket2:22-cv-00289

StatusUnknown

This text of Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of Sacramento (Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of Sacramento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of Sacramento, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 Peridot Tree, Inc., et al., No. 2:22-cv-00289-KJM-DB 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER 10 V. 1] City of Sacramento, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 The plaintiffs in this action seek damages and equitable relief based on allegations that 15 | two local ordinances unconstitutionally hamper interstate commerce in cannabis. See generally 16 | First Am. Compl., ECF No. 12. The defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) is 17 | currently pending, and the court has oral arguments scheduled for a combined motion hearing and 18 | scheduling conference on May 27, 2022. See Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 13; Min. Order, ECF 19 | No. 14. On the court’s own motion, the hearing and conference are vacated and reset for 20 | June 17, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. The parties are directed to submit 21 | simultaneous supplemental briefs of no more than ten pages each, to be filed by June 3, 2022 22 | at 5 p.m., addressing whether this court should abstain from adjudicating this action. See, e.g., 23 | Gopal v. Luther, No. 21-00735, 2022 WL 504983, at *3-4 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2022) (collecting 24 | authority and abstaining from exercising jurisdiction over a dispute about contracts and 25 | regulations related to the sale and distribution of cannabis). 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 16, 2022. 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 Peridot Tree, Inc., et al., No. 2:22-cv-00289-KJM-DB 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER 10 V. 1] City of Sacramento, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 The plaintiffs in this action seek damages and equitable relief based on allegations that 15 | two local ordinances unconstitutionally hamper interstate commerce in cannabis. See generally 16 | First Am. Compl., ECF No. 12. The defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) is 17 | currently pending, and the court has oral arguments scheduled for a combined motion hearing and 18 | scheduling conference on May 27, 2022. See Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 13; Min. Order, ECF 19 | No. 14. On the court’s own motion, the hearing and conference are vacated and reset for 20 | June 17, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. The parties are directed to submit 21 | simultaneous supplemental briefs of no more than ten pages each, to be filed by June 3, 2022 22 | at 5 p.m., addressing whether this court should abstain from adjudicating this action. See, e.g., 23 | Gopal v. Luther, No. 21-00735, 2022 WL 504983, at *3-4 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2022) (collecting 24 | authority and abstaining from exercising jurisdiction over a dispute about contracts and 25 | regulations related to the sale and distribution of cannabis). 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 16, 2022. 27

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of Sacramento, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peridot-tree-inc-v-city-of-sacramento-caed-2022.