Periconi v. Marotta
This text of 34 A.D.2d 1035 (Periconi v. Marotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum by the Court. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The failure of the subscribing witnesses to state the Election and Assembly Districts in which they presently reside was a substantial departure from the requirements of the Election Law (§ 135, subd. 3) which renders the petition invalid (Matter of Crosbie V. Cohen, 281 N. Y. 329; Matter of Maurin v. Allis, 28 A D 2d 810, affd. 20 N Y 2d 671). Herlihy, P. J., Aulisi, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A.D.2d 1035, 311 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/periconi-v-marotta-nyappdiv-1970.