Periconi v. Marotta
34 A.D.2d 1035, 311 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4552
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 1970·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Memorandum by the Court. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The failure of the subscribing witnesses to state the Election and Assembly Districts in which they presently reside was a substantial departure from the requirements of the Election Law (§ 135, subd. 3) which renders the petition invalid (Matter of Crosbie V. Cohen, 281 N. Y. 329; Matter of Maurin v. Allis, 28 A D 2d 810, affd. 20 N Y 2d 671). Herlihy, P. J., Aulisi, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Periconi v. Marotta, 34 A.D.2d 1035, 311 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).
34 A.D.2d 1035 (Periconi v. Marotta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldstein v. Carlsen
59 A.D.2d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Schnurr v. May
54 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)