Peric v. Peric

Michigan Supreme Court

Peric v. Peric

707 N.W.2d 590, 474 Mich. 990

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 28, 2005

Docket129938

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 707 N.W.2d 590 (Peric v. Peric) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peric v. Peric, 707 N.W.2d 590, 474 Mich. 990 (Mich. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

707 N.W.2d 590 (2005) 474 Mich. 990

Predrag PERIC, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wendy Leigh PERIC, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket Nos. 129938 & (64). COA No. 259222.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 28, 2005.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for dismissal is DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

707 N.W.2d 590 (2005) 474 Mich. 990

Predrag PERIC, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wendy Leigh PERIC, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket Nos. 129938 & (64). COA No. 259222.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 28, 2005.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for dismissal is DENIED as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

707 N.W.2d 590, 474 Mich. 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peric-v-peric-mich-2005.

Opinion

Predrag PERIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wendy Leigh PERIC, Defendant-Appellee.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Predrag PERIC, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wendy Leigh PERIC, Defendant-Appellee.