Peric v. Peric

Michigan Supreme Court

Peric v. Peric

707 N.W.2d 590, 474 Mich. 990

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 28, 2005·No. 129938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

707 N.W.2d 590 (2005) 474 Mich. 990

Predrag PERIC, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wendy Leigh PERIC, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket Nos. 129938 & (64). COA No. 259222.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 28, 2005.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for dismissal is DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

707 N.W.2d 590 (2005) 474 Mich. 990

Predrag PERIC, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wendy Leigh PERIC, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket Nos. 129938 & (64). COA No. 259222.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 28, 2005.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for dismissal is DENIED as moot.

Peric v. Peric, 707 N.W.2d 590, 474 Mich. 990 (Mich. 2005).

Pincite

707 N.W.2d 590 (Peric v. Peric) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Predrag PERIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wendy Leigh PERIC, Defendant-Appellee.

Related

Predrag PERIC, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wendy Leigh PERIC, Defendant-Appellee.