Peri v. State
458 So. 2d 62, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2251, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15823
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 1984·No. No. 84-791·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The defendant appeals from the denial of a Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion based on the alleged ineffectiveness of appellate counsel. See Peri v. State, 412 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Because this claim may be asserted only in a habeas corpus proceeding in the appellate court, Smith v. State, 400 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981); Knight v. State, [63]*63394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981), the order under review is affirmed without prejudice to the filing of such a petition.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peri v. State, 458 So. 2d 62, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2251, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15823 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
458 So. 2d 62 (Peri v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martinez v. State
655 So. 2d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Hernandez v. State
501 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
McCullum v. State
498 So. 2d 1374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)