Peri v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peri v. State

458 So. 2d 62, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2251, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15823

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 23, 1984

DocketNo. 84-791

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 62 (Peri v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peri v. State, 458 So. 2d 62, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2251, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15823 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from the denial of a Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion based on the alleged ineffectiveness of appellate counsel. See Peri v. State, 412 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Because this claim may be asserted only in a habeas corpus proceeding in the appellate court, Smith v. State, 400 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981); Knight v. State, [63]*63394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981), the order under review is affirmed without prejudice to the filing of such a petition.¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from the denial of a Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion based on the alleged ineffectiveness of appellate counsel. See Peri v. State, 412 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Because this claim may be asserted only in a habeas corpus proceeding in the appellate court, Smith v. State, 400 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981); Knight v. State, [63]*63394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981), the order under review is affirmed without prejudice to the filing of such a petition.¹

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

458 So. 2d 62, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2251, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peri-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack