Peri Roanne Weingrad v. Constance Jones
This text of Peri Roanne Weingrad v. Constance Jones (Peri Roanne Weingrad v. Constance Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 8, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
160605 & (50) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra PERI ROANNE WEINGRAD, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 160605 COA: 342873 Washtenaw PC: 17-000520-CZ CONSTANCE JONES, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for relief is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 8, 2020 t0831 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Peri Roanne Weingrad v. Constance Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peri-roanne-weingrad-v-constance-jones-mich-2020.