Perham v. Lane

83 A. 805, 76 N.H. 580, 1912 N.H. LEXIS 98
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 4, 1912·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Peaslee, J.

The defendant's counsel has not furnished a brief, and no debatable question has been found in the case. The evidence, instead of being conclusive in favor of the defendant, was conclusive against her. State v. Harrington, 69 N. H. 496. The *581 former bill was for an earlier default and not for those relied upon here. In such a case the doctrine that a second suit must abate has no application.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perham v. Lane, 83 A. 805, 76 N.H. 580, 1912 N.H. LEXIS 98 (N.H. 1912).

83 A. 805 (Perham v. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nawn v. Boston & Maine Railroad
91 A. 181 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1914)