Perham v. Lane

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Perham v. Lane

83 A. 805, 76 N.H. 580, 1912 N.H. LEXIS 98

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 4, 1912

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 A. 805 (Perham v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perham v. Lane, 83 A. 805, 76 N.H. 580, 1912 N.H. LEXIS 98 (N.H. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Peaslee, J.

The defendant's counsel has not furnished a brief, and no debatable question has been found in the case. The evidence, instead of being conclusive in favor of the defendant, was conclusive against her. State v. Harrington, 69 N. H. 496. The *581 former bill was for an earlier default and not for those relied upon here. In such a case the doctrine that a second suit must abate has no application.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peaslee, J.

The defendant's counsel has not furnished a brief, and no debatable question has been found in the case. The evidence, instead of being conclusive in favor of the defendant, was conclusive against her. State v. Harrington, 69 N. H. 496. The *581 former bill was for an earlier default and not for those relied upon here. In such a case the doctrine that a second suit must abate has no application.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A. 805, 76 N.H. 580, 1912 N.H. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perham-v-lane-nh-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack