Performance Paint Yacht Refinishing, Inc. v. Resnick

639 So. 2d 1127, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7426, 1994 WL 386721
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 1994·No. No. 93-2848·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellants that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion to dismiss Count III of their amended complaint with prejudice. The allegations contained in that count are sufficient to state a cause of action for libel. See Florida Medical Ctr., Inc. v. New York Post Co., 568 So.2d 454 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), rev. denied, 581 So.2d 1309 (Fla.1991); Owner’s Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott, 402 So.2d 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

ANSTEAD and STEVENSON, JJ., and MICKLE, STEPHAN PIERRE, Associate JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Performance Paint Yacht Refinishing, Inc. v. Resnick, 639 So. 2d 1127, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7426, 1994 WL 386721 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

639 So. 2d 1127 (Performance Paint Yacht Refinishing, Inc. v. Resnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Med. Center, Inc. v. New York Post Co.
568 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Owner's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott
402 So. 2d 466 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)