Performance Paint Yacht Refinishing, Inc. v. Resnick
Opinion
We agree with appellants that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion to dismiss Count III of their amended complaint with prejudice. The allegations contained in that count are sufficient to state a cause of action for libel. See Florida Medical Ctr., Inc. v. New York Post Co., 568 So.2d 454 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), rev. denied, 581 So.2d 1309 (Fla.1991); Owner’s Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott, 402 So.2d 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
639 So. 2d 1127 (Performance Paint Yacht Refinishing, Inc. v. Resnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.