Perfection Pulverizing Mills v. Keiser

Appellate Court of Illinois

Perfection Pulverizing Mills v. Keiser

203 Ill. App. 383, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 250

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 7, 1917

DocketGen. No. 21,504

StatusPublished

This text of 203 Ill. App. 383 (Perfection Pulverizing Mills v. Keiser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perfection Pulverizing Mills v. Keiser, 203 Ill. App. 383, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 250 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Skr-osF and recoupment, § 13*—when undisclosed agent may claim set-off available to principal. An undisclosed agent sued upon a contract made by him with reference to his principal’s business has as much right to claim set-off in such action as his principal. 5. Judgment, § 475*—when judgment on set-off by agent is res adjudícala as to principal. Recovery on set-off made by an undisclosed agent when sued for a debt of the principal is res adjudicata as to both him and his principal. " 6. Appeal and error, § 1256*—when party may not complain of instruction. A party cannot complain of an alleged erroneous instruction which is favorable to him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Skr-osF and recoupment, § 13*—when undisclosed agent may claim set-off available to principal. An undisclosed agent sued upon a contract made by him with reference to his principal’s business has as much right to claim set-off in such action as his principal. 5. Judgment, § 475*—when judgment on set-off by agent is res adjudícala as to principal. Recovery on set-off made by an undisclosed agent when sued for a debt of the principal is res adjudicata as to both him and his principal. " 6. Appeal and error, § 1256*—when party may not complain of instruction. A party cannot complain of an alleged erroneous instruction which is favorable to him.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 Ill. App. 383, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perfection-pulverizing-mills-v-keiser-illappct-1917.