Perez v. Verret

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Perez v. Verret

588 So. 2d 398, 1991 La. App. LEXIS 2751, 1991 WL 223829

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 16, 1991

DocketNo. 91-CA-231

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 588 So. 2d 398 (Perez v. Verret) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perez v. Verret, 588 So. 2d 398, 1991 La. App. LEXIS 2751, 1991 WL 223829 (La. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal relates to the overruling of a declinatory exception of insufficient service of process. We dismiss the matter.

La.C.C.P. art. 2083 governs appealable judgments. Art. 2083 provides:

A. An appeal may be taken from a final judgment rendered in causes in which appeals are given by law whether rendered after hearing or by default, from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury, and from a judgment reformed in accordance with a remittitur or additur under Article 1814.

B. In reviewing a judgment reformed in accordance with a remittitur or addi-tur, the court shall consider the reasonableness of the underlying jury verdict.

A judgment overruling an exception is interlocutory in nature and, therefore, is not appealable absent a showing of irreparable injury, and we find none.

For the reasons assigned, the matter is dismissed. All costs of this appeal are to be assessed against the appellant.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI