Perez v. United States

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 6, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-01734·Unknown

Opinion

NICHOLAS ANGEL PEREZ, Case No.: 1:18-cv-01734 DAD JLT

Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION (Doc. 22) v.

Defendant.

The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each sied to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 22 at 2) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

Dated: October 6, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. United States, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Perez v. United States (Perez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)