Perez v. Unger
591 So. 2d 1154, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 435, 1991 WL 276899
Opinion
CORRECTED OPINION
In a previous appeal, the plaintiff represented to this court that he would “adhere to the requirements for the prosecution of his case.” See Perez v. Unger, 571 So.2d 67 (Fla.3d DCA 1990). In addition, the plaintiff was warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not meet the requirements.
Accordingly, we affirm. See Arango v. Alvarez, 585 So.2d 1131 (Fla.3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perez v. Unger, 591 So. 2d 1154, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 435, 1991 WL 276899 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
591 So. 2d 1154 (Perez v. Unger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arango v. Alvarez
585 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Perez v. Unger
571 So. 2d 67 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)