Perez v. Unger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perez v. Unger

591 So. 2d 1154, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 435, 1991 WL 276899

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 21, 1992

DocketNo. 91-802

StatusPublished

This text of 591 So. 2d 1154 (Perez v. Unger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perez v. Unger, 591 So. 2d 1154, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 435, 1991 WL 276899 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In a previous appeal, the plaintiff represented to this court that he would “adhere to the requirements for the prosecution of his case.” See Perez v. Unger, 571 So.2d 67 (Fla.3d DCA 1990). In addition, the plaintiff was warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not meet the requirements.

Accordingly, we affirm. See Arango v. Alvarez, 585 So.2d 1131 (Fla.3d DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI