Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perez v. State

932 So. 2d 357, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10809, 2006 WL 1697819

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 2006

DocketNo. 3D05-2245

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 932 So. 2d 357 (Perez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perez v. State, 932 So. 2d 357, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10809, 2006 WL 1697819 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On Motion to Amend Motion for Rehearing

Upon consideration, appellant’s motion to amend motion for rehearing is denied.

We recently affirmed appellant’s sentence in this case. We then denied a timely motion for rehearing filed. We now have before us a subsequently filed motion to amend motion for rehearing.

We treat this motion as a second motion for rehearing. Because Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330(b) clearly allow for only one motion of rehearing, we deny the motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.330(b) (“A party shall not file more than 1 motion for rehearing or for clarification of decision and 1 motion for certification with respect to a particular decision.”).

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI