Perez v. State

448 So. 2d 1052, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12131
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 1984
DocketNo. AW-311
StatusPublished

This text of 448 So. 2d 1052 (Perez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perez v. State, 448 So. 2d 1052, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12131 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Contending he was misinformed of the consequences of his guilty plea to a charge of burglary, Perez appeals from the trial court’s order summarily denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.

The transcript of the plea dialogue between Perez and the trial judge conclusively shows Perez understood the consequences of his guilty plea and that he knowingly and intelligently pled guilty. Scott v. State, 423 So.2d 978 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH, J., and McCORD,' GUYTE P., Jr., (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. State
423 So. 2d 978 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 So. 2d 1052, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.