Perez v. Sims
This text of 156 P. 97 (Perez v. Sims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts, the issues raised, the proceedings in the court below, and the questions to be decided [82]*82on this appeal, are identical with those on the appeal of Francisco Rodriguez, Appellant, v. R. B. Sims, Superintendent of the State Prison of the State of Arizona, Respondent, ante, p. 74, 156 Pac. 94, being Criminal Cause No. 385 just decided by this court. On the authority of that case, the order or judgment appealed from is affirmed.
It appearing that the judgment of death has not been executed, and that the time fixed for the execution therefor ■has passed, it will become the duty of the superior court in which the conviction of said Eduardo Perez was had, on application of the county attorney of the county in which the conviction was had, to proceed under the provisions of section 1147 of the Penal Code, and specify such time for the execution of such judgment as to said court may seem meet and proper.
CUNNINGHAM, J., and STANFORD, Superior Court Judge, concur.
N. B. — Chief Justice ROSS being disqualified and announcing his disqualification in open court, the remaining judges, under section 3 of article 6 of the Constitution, called in Honorable R. C. STANFORD, Judge of the superior court of the state of Arizona in and for the county of Maricopa, to ¡sit with them in the hearing of this cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 P. 97, 18 Ariz. 81, 1916 Ariz. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-sims-ariz-1916.