Perez v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.
902 A.2d 1232, 188 N.J. 215, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1160
Opinion
ORDERED that the motion for clarification is granted, limited to the following: The judgment of the Court is prospective, except that it applies to plaintiff and if the trial court certifies this matter as a class action as part of the proceedings it conducts pursuant to the Court’s remand, to the members of the class.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perez v. Rent-A-Center, Inc., 902 A.2d 1232, 188 N.J. 215, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1160 (N.J. 2006).
902 A.2d 1232 (Perez v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Galloway Tp. & Bridgeton
12 A.3d 232 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2011)
Silva v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.
454 Mass. 667 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2009)