Perez v. Pelea
510 So. 2d 1167, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1949, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9778
Opinions
We affirm the final judgment under review but remand with directions to the trial court to conform the provisions of the final judgment dealing with the sale of the marital domicile to this court’s pronouncement in Tinsley v. Tinsley, 490 So.2d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perez v. Pelea, 510 So. 2d 1167, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1949, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9778 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
510 So. 2d 1167 (Perez v. Pelea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Price v. Price
389 So. 2d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Lyons v. Lyons
208 So. 2d 137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Rutkin v. Rutkin
345 So. 2d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Tinsley v. Tinsley
490 So. 2d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)